Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Reproductive behavior and erectile dysfunction in the undergraduate university students: cross-sectional study
Comportamiento reproductivo y disfunción eréctil en estudiantes universitarios de pregrado: estudio transversal
1Kazakhstan-Russian Medical University, 050021 Almaty, Kazakhstan
2The Scientific Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 050040 Almaty, Kazakhstan
3Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 050040 Almaty, Kazakhstan
4Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russian Federation
DOI: 10.22514/j.androl.2025.005 Vol.23,Issue 1,March 2025 pp.13-18
Submitted: 29 October 2024 Accepted: 19 November 2024
Published: 30 March 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Denis Vinnikov E-mail: Denis.Vinnikov@kaznu.edu.kz
Background: Very little is known about erectile function (EF) and its associated predictors in the university students. The aim was to quantify the prevalence and some associated predictors of EF in a large sample of the university students from the largest National University in Kazakhstan. Methods: At Kazakh National University, 1556 male students aged 16 to 23 years filled in anonymous self-administered web-based questionnaire on their sexual and reproductive behavior, including the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) in 2023. We report age-specific prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED), defined as IIEF-5 below 22 and the association of IIEF-5 score with selected predictors in adjusted regression models. Results: At least one sexual intercourse was reported by 1306 (84%) students with the first coitus at the median age 17 (interquartile range (IQR) 17; 19) years; and 10% students reported only one ever intercourse. The median number of partners in the preceding 12 months was 1 (IQR 1; 2), but 27% reported they planned to have a child in the next 2 years (100% of 16–17-year-old and 0% of 19–20-year-old students). IIEF-5 score ranged from 21 to 25 (median 25, IQR 21; 25), and was negatively associated with age, independent of ethnicity, place of residence, number of partners and other predictors. No ED was reported by 63% (N = 827), whereas mild ED prevalence was 37% (N = 479) among students who had at least one intercourse. Conclusions: The overall prevalence of ED was very low and associated with age. Preventive interventions in place are likely efficient, but future research should focus on previously unmeasured sexual behavior attributes.
Resumen
Antecedentes: Se sabe muy poco sobre la función eréctil (FE) y sus predictores asociados en los estudiantes universitarios. El objetivo fue cuantificar la prevalencia y algunos predictores asociados de FE en una gran muestra de estudiantes universitarios de la Universidad Nacional más grande de Kazajstán. Métodos: En la Universidad Nacional de Kazajstán, 1556 estudiantes varones de entre 16 y 23 años completaron un cuestionario anónimo autoadministrado en la web sobre su comportamiento sexual y reproductivo, incluido el Índice Internacional de Función Eréctil (IIEF-5) en 2023. Informamos la prevalencia específica por edad de disfunción eréctil (DE), definida como IIEF-5 por debajo de 22 y la asociación de la puntuación IIEF-5 con predictores seleccionados en modelos de regresión ajustados. Resultados: Al menos una relación sexual fue reportada por 1306 (84%) estudiantes con el primer coito a la mediana de edad de 17 años (rango intercuartil (IQR) 17; 19) años; y el 10% de los estudiantes informaron solo una relación sexual. La mediana del número de parejas en los 12 meses anteriores fue de 1 (IQR 1; 2), pero el 27% informó que planeaba tener un hijo en los próximos 2 años (100% de estudiantes de 16 a 17 años y 0% de estudiantes de 19 a 20 años). La puntuación del IIEF-5 varió de 21 a 25 (mediana 25, IQR 21; 25) y se asoció negativamente con la edad, independientemente de la etnia, el lugar de residencia, el número de parejas y otros predictores. El 63% (N = 827) no reportó disfunción eréctil, mientras que la prevalencia de disfunción eréctil leve fue del 37% (N = 479) entre los estudiantes que tuvieron al menos una relación sexual. Conclusiones: La prevalencia general de disfunción eréctil fue muy baja y se asoció con la edad. Las intervenciones preventivas implementadas probablemente sean eficientes, pero las investigaciones futuras deberían centrarse en atributos de comportamiento sexual previamente no medidos.
Intercourse; IIEF-5; Regression; Young adults
Palabras Clave
Relaciones sexuales; IIEF-5; Regresión; Adultos jóvenes
Malik Safargaliyev,Denis Vinnikov. Reproductive behavior and erectile dysfunction in the undergraduate university students: cross-sectional studyComportamiento reproductivo y disfunción eréctil en estudiantes universitarios de pregrado: estudio transversal. Revista Internacional de Andrología. 2025. 23(1);13-18.
[1] Vinnikov D, Romanova Z, Dushpanova A, Absatarova K, Utepbergenova Z. Prevalence of supplement use in recreationally active Kazakhstan university students. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2018; 15: 16.
[2] Coronado PJ, Delgado-Miguel C, Rey-Cañas A, Herráiz MA. Sexual and reproductive health in Spanish University Students. A comparison between medical and law students. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 2017; 11: 97–101.
[3] Guan M. Sexual and reproductive health knowledge, sexual attitudes, and sexual behaviour of university students: findings of a Beijing-Based Survey in 2010–2011. Archives of Public Health. 2021; 79: 215.
[4] Jahanfar S, Pashaei Z. Sexual attitudes and associated factors of risky sexual behaviors among university students. Brain and Behavior. 2022; 12: e2698.
[5] Nho JH, Yoo SH. Relationships among lifestyle, depression, anxiety, and reproductive health in female university students. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2018; 24: 80–89.
[6] Provenzano S, Santangelo OE, Alagna E, Giordano D, Firenze A. Sexual and reproductive health risk behaviours among Palermo university students: results from an online survey. La Clinica Terapeutica. 2018; 169: e242–e248.
[7] Subotic S, Vukomanovic V, Djukic S, Radevic S, Radovanovic S, Radulovic D, et al. Differences regarding knowledge of sexually transmitted infections, sexual habits, and behavior between university students of medical and nonmedical professions in Serbia. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021; 9: 692461.
[8] Yedemie YY. Evaluating the prevalence and patterns of sexual risk behavior among undergraduate university students in Ethiopia: implication for psychosocial intervention. International Quarterly of Community Health Education. 2020; 41: 63–67.
[9] Yari F, Moghadam ZB, Parvizi S, Nayeri ND, Rezaei E. Sexual and reproductive health problems of female university students in Iran: a qualitative study. Global Journal of Health Science. 2015; 7: 278–285.
[10] Castellini G, Rellini AH, Appignanesi C, Pinucci I, Fattorini M, Grano E, et al. Deviance or normalcy? The relationship among paraphilic thoughts and behaviors, hypersexuality, and psychopathology in a sample of university students. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2018; 15: 1322–1335.
[11] Freitas VM, Menezes FG, Antonialli MM, Nascimento JW. Use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors by college students. Revista De Saude Publica. 2008; 42: 965–967.
[12] Gebreyohannes EA, Bhagavathula AS, Gebresillassie BM, Tefera YG, Belachew SA, Erku DA. Recreational use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and its associated factors among undergraduate male students in an Ethiopian university: a cross-sectional study. The World Journal of Men’s Health. 2016; 34: 186–193.
[13] Guzzo KB, Hayford SR. Adolescent reproductive and contraceptive knowledge and attitudes and adult contraceptive behavior. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2018; 22: 32–40.
[14] Gutierrez-Velarde P, Valladares-Garrido MJ, Peralta CI, Vera-Ponce VJ, Grandez-Urbina JA. Poor sleep quality and erectile dysfunction in students from a Peruvian University: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023; 11: 932718.
[15] Elterman DS, Bhattacharyya SK, Mafilios M, Woodward E, Nitschelm K, Burnett AL. The quality of life and economic burden of erectile dysfunction. Research and Reports in Urology. 2021; 13: 79–86.
[16] Martins FG, Abdo CHN. Erectile dysfunction and correlated factors in Brazilian men aged 18–40 years. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2010; 7: 2166–2173.
[17] Schmid SM, Hallschmid M, Jauch-Chara K, Lehnert H, Schultes B. Sleep timing may modulate the effect of sleep loss on testosterone. Clinical Endocrinology. 2012; 77: 749–754.
[18] Caskurlu T, Tasci AI, Resim S, Sahinkanat T, Ergenekon E. The etiology of erectile dysfunction and contributing factors in different age groups in Turkey. International Journal of Urology. 2004; 11: 525–529.
[19] Brixius K, Middeke M, Lichtenthal A, Jahn E, Schwinger RHG. Nitric oxide, erectile dysfunction and beta-blocker treatment (MR NOED study): benefit of nebivolol versus metoprolol in hypertensive men. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology. 2007; 34: 327–331.
[20] Nguyen HMT, Gabrielson AT, Hellstrom WJG. Erectile dysfunction in young men—a review of the prevalence and risk factors. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2017; 5: 508–520.
Top